Debates have been going onthe subject of carbon capture. Scientists, especially engineers and geologists, have strongly criticized green groups who claimed that carbon capture and storage (CCS) schemes are costly mistakes.
The scientists insisted that such schemesvital weapons in the battle against global heating. They also warn that failure to set up ways to trap and store carbon would make it(possible) to meet the emissions target by 2050. "CCS is going to be the only effective way in the short term(prevent) our steel industry, cement manufacture and many other processes from continuing to pour emissions into the atmosphere," said Professor Stuart Haszeldine, of Edinburgh University. "we are to have any hope of keeping global temperature increases down below 2 degrees Celsius, we desperately need to develop ways to capture and store carbon dioxide."
Green groups claimed CCS would not make "a meaningful contribution to 2050 climate targets". They say CCS was not reliable to decarbonize the energy system and that CCS hashistory of over-promising and under-delivering. Instead, they urged the construction of more renewable energy plants(give) priority.
But the claims(dismiss) by engineers and geologists. "These claims are quite unfair," said Michael Stephenson, director at the British Geological Survey.
A government spokesman for the Department of Energy and Climate Change said, "We are committed to meeting our climate change targets in a wayis affordable and provides secure energy to families and businesses. We are considering the role that CCS could play in decarbonization of the UK. But we also need to take government(spend) into account. CCS had better come down in cost."
