When we see a person in trouble, our immediate idea is to give a hand. If not, we'll feel uncomfortable. But what if we see an animal in danger, will we do the same?
This question was raised after a group of penguins were saved from an icy gully*. It was filmed for the BBC wildlife series Dynasties. The film team was frightened when they' saw: that 'a group of penguins had fallen into a gully and been trapped*with the young. The team built a slope* so that a few of the penguins could save themselves.
The case has attracted the public attention: Audiences watching this film all feltrelievedin the end. "My heart was beating really: quickly at first while watching those penguins in a gully." the audience Kathryn Shaw said, "But I finally took a deep breath when noticing that- slope! I understand not intervening directly, but a helping hand isn't troubling, right?"
However, others think that human intervention. It's an natural. It's an unwritten rule that film makers are there only to watch; not to have a hand in it, according to CBS News. You can't have sunshine throughout your life. To have done anything else would only make things worse." "said a famous show's creator David Attenborough.
In this case, however; Mike Gunton, the producer of Dynasties; said that this was only an accidental situation "There were no animals going to suffer by intervening" It wasn't dangerous. You weren't touching the animals and by doing this they had the chance to run away from in the gully." he told the BBC. Such cases are not new to the wildlife photographed ·Paul NickIen, who told Metro." If it's ever a, predator*situation, no matter how heart-breaking, you stay out of the way. Even when you are watching an adult polar bear eat a baby sea dog." But he said that he would help animals if he saw no influence to nature.
Actually, there will always be two sides to the coin; and human beings will forever argue about this situation.
